Flag
Cuban Anthem

No Castro nor his regime !

Escudo

 

updated 08/03/04

What's New
Events
Commentaries
Elián Archive
News Archive
Castro's Accomplices
Education
Atrocities
Embargo
Terrorism
Facts & Figures
Image Gallery
You Can Help
Personalities
Religion
Documents
Links
Contact Us
Home

Published Friday 16, 2001, in the Miami Herald

Embargo's impact slight, report says Cuba's trade seen as limited by own politics 

BY KEN GUGGENHEIM 
Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- U.S. sanctions on Cuba have cost   Americans less than $1 billion a year in exports and have had a similarly minimal impact on the  communist island, according to the most  comprehensive federal study ever of the embargo's  impact.

 The International Trade Commission report, sent  Thursday to the House Ways and Means Committee  but not released publicly, could provide fodder  to those on both sides of the debate over lifting  the 39-year-old trade embargo. An executive  summary was obtained by the Associated Press.

Supporters of the embargo can say the report  boosts their argument that U.S. businesses are  losing relatively few trade opportunities because of the sanctions and that lifting the sanctions  would do little to boost Cuba's weak economy and poor living conditions.

 ``U.S. economic sanctions with respect to Cuba  generally had a minimal overall historical  impact'' on the Cuban and U.S. economies, it  said.

 Even without sanctions, Cuba's own policies would  limit trade, the analysts said. 

 ``Cuba . . . tends to select its trade and  investment partners based on political  considerations -- the desire to maintain economic  ties with existing partners and to avoid becoming economically dependent on a single country -- rather than economic cost factors,'' the report said.

But opponents can point to specific instances where the sanctions have cost the United States  trade opportunities -- most notably rice, where  U.S. export losses have been ``significant.''

RICE IMPORTS

 The sanctions cost U.S. rice growers what had been their leading market from 1955-58. Without sanctions, U.S. rice imports could have increased  by 3 percent to 5 percent a year, the report  said.

 And the study noted that an estimated 1 million U.S. tourists would visit Cuba each year if the  sanctions were lifted -- which could benefit U.S. travel businesses that book the trips, along with  the Cuban economy. 

 Overall, the report estimates the United States  would have gained $652 million to $990 million a  year in exports if the sanctions had been lifted. Cuba would have gained $84 million to $167 million a year.

In contrast, U.S. companies export more than four times that amount with the Dominican Republic, a  smaller Caribbean country. 

 EXILE REACTION 

 ``I think the ITC basically established what  we've been saying all along, which is that  there's a minimal impact on U.S. business of the sanctions,'' said Dennis Hays, executive vice  president of the Cuban-American National  Foundation.

 The study by the independent, nonpartisan agency  is believed to be the first objective attempt by  the U.S. government to study the economic effects of sanctions imposed by President John F. Kennedy to pressure democratic changes in Fidel Castro's  communist Cuba. 

Pressure has slowly grown in Congress to lift the sanctions, with some farm-state Republicans  joining liberal Democrats in arguing that  sanctions are ineffective and have hurt both  Cubans and Americans. But President Bush has said he favors maintaining the sanctions.

 TOOK NO SIDES 

 The study did not make a recommendation about  whether the embargo should be continued.

Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., who last year   unsuccessfully proposed easing the sanctions,  plans to offer a similar proposal again this  year.

 ``U.S. policy-makers need to take a long hard  look at our policy -- one that is more than 10  years out of date,'' Baucus spokesman Michael   Siegel said. ``It only serves to hurt the Cuban   people and punish U.S. businesses and it should  be repealed.'' 

John Kavulich, president of the U.S.-Cuba Trade  and Economic Council, said the study's  conclusions on the embargo's impact can be viewed  from different perspectives: from those who  looking at the sanctions' effect on the two  nations' economies and those who consider how  individual businesses may be affected.

 ``For some it's not significant. For others it  will be and they'll both have a legitimate  point,'' he said.

Copyright 2001 the Miami Herald.
Republished here with the permission of the Miami Herald. No further republication or redistribution is permitted without the written approval of The Miami Herald.